Comparison matrix
Pick a provider group, then narrow by parent company or license type. Each section below sorts and exports on its own.
KeyQuote verified against sourceQuote not verified against sourceNo provision foundNot applicable
Cloud Infrastructure Providers 10
checked 2026-08-16 02:22 UTC.xlsx
| Term dimension | Amazon Web ServicesHyperscaler | Microsoft AzureHyperscaler | Google CloudHyperscaler | CoreWeaveNeocloud | LambdaNeocloud | CrusoeNeocloud | Together AINeocloud | BasetenNeocloud | RunpodNeocloud | Vast.aiNeocloud |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity & reservation terms |
Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, Capacity Blocks; noncancellable/nonrefundable; some enterprise commitments negotiated, not published
“Savings Plans, EC2 Reserved Instances and EC2 Dedicated Host Reservations are noncancellable” AWS Enterprise Discount Program (EDP): negotiated, not published (program) Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Reserved capacity offered (Capacity Blocks, On Demand Capacity Reservations); enterprise commitment terms negotiated, not published
“Capacity Block means a reservation of compute capacity for a specified duration” Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC): negotiated, not published (program) Source: SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) · fetched 2026-07-15
|
Committed Units (committed-use); non-cancellable, pay whether used or not; future reservations discretionary; auto-renew
“Customer will pay the Fees for those Committed Units during the Committed Unit Term…” Google Cloud Committed Use Discounts (CUDs): negotiated, not published (program) Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
not specified in public documents; enterprise commitment terms negotiated, not published
|
not specified in public docs; committed terms via Orders (negotiated, not published)
|
not specified; committed/reserved capacity terms not published in these terms
“Customer’s obligation to pay all Fees is non-cancellable.” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
not specified; commercial terms via order form
“unless otherwise agreed between the parties in an order form” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Reserved vs on-demand capacity concept referenced in SLA; commercial commitment terms negotiated privately, not published
“capacity that is not reserved (eg on-demand capacity) or Customer reaching or exceeding its…” Source: Baseten Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Subscriptions with auto-renewal; no published reserved/committed-capacity or take-or-pay terms; enterprise commitment vehicles negotiated, not published
“YOUR SUBSCRIPTION WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR ADDITIONAL PERIODS” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Vast.ai Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
| Data use & AI training |
Varies by service; some AI services use content to improve models by default with AWS Organizations opt-out; core content not used to train
“we may use and store AI Content that is not personal data to develop…” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Never trains on customer data by default; only per documented instructions
“will not use Customer Data to train any generative AI foundation model” Source: Microsoft Product Terms for Online Services · fetched 2026-08-01
|
Never trains on Customer Data without permission; prompt/output not stored beyond necessary absent permission
“Google will not use Customer Data to train or fine-tune any AI/ML models without…” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No AI-training language; DPA prohibits using data except to provide services; no ZDR/retention period stated
“not retain, use or disclose Processed Customer Data for any purpose other than for…” Source: CoreWeave Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No AI-model training on customer content stated; provider may use aggregated/anonymized usage info; no ZDR terms
“Lambda may use data concerning Customer's or its Users' use of the Services in…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Never used for other products; will not use Customer Data for other Crusoe products, services, or advertising; no ZDR stated
“will not use it for any other Crusoe products, services, or advertising” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
opt-in only (never train without explicit opt-in); ZDR available via settings
“will not be used to train the Company's models without your explicit opt-in and…” Source: Together AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No training on Customer Content stated; Baseten owns anonymized/aggregated Statistical Data used to improve Services; ZDR not specified
“compile deidentified, anonymized and/or aggregated statistical information related to the usage and performance” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Uses Your Content aggregated/anonymized to improve Service; no ZDR published; Serverless can restrict to compliant data centers
“use Your Content in an aggregated and anonymized form to update and improve the…” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No AI-training language for customer content; provider may use Anonymous Data for own purposes; Google API data not shared with AI models. No ZDR provision.
“Processor may use Anonymous Data for its own purposes.” Source: Vast.ai Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Suspension rights |
Immediate suspension upon notice for security risk, material breach, non-payment, or insolvency
“We may suspend your or any End User's right to access or use any…” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Suspension for AUP breach or material breach; reasonable notice unless immediate needed
“violations of the Acceptable Use Policy in this section may result in suspension” Source: Microsoft Product Terms for Online Services · fetched 2026-08-01
|
AUP breach: 24h notice-to-cure then suspend; immediate suspension for security/law/restrictions breach; non-payment
“Google may immediately Suspend all or part of Customer's use of the Services if” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
AUP breach; payment issues; may suspend or terminate; can be immediate/sole discretion, no notice required
“suspend or terminate Customer's use of CoreWeave Services” Source: CoreWeave Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-17
|
May suspend/throttle/terminate immediately for breach, excessive use, unauthorized access, or legal requirement; also for late payment
“Lambda may immediately suspend, throttle or terminate access to the Services if” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
AUP breach (24h cure then suspend); immediate suspension for security risk, legal compliance, unauthorized access, Restrictions breach; non-payment
“Crusoe may immediately Suspend all or part of Customer’s use of the Services” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Suspend/terminate for breach, credible risk of harm, or legal requirement; non-payment 5 days past due; notice generally given
“suspend your access to the Services immediately upon notice if you fail to pay” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Suspension for fees more than 30 days overdue; immediate discontinuation, no notice specified
“suspend all Authorized Users' and Customer's access to the Services if any Fees are…” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Immediate suspension/termination without notice for material breach, system stress, or legal requirement
“immediately and without notice, suspend or terminate any Service provided to you” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
May deny access for any reason or no reason without notice; immediate suspension/termination for export-law violations or non-payment/chargebacks
“DENY ACCESS TO AND USE OF THE WEBSITE... FOR ANY REASON OR FOR NO…” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Termination |
Either party for convenience (AWS 30 days' notice); 30-day post-termination data retrieval if amounts paid
“We may terminate this Agreement for any reason by providing you at least 30…” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Either party may terminate for convenience on 60 days notice; 90-day data extraction on disabled account
“Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause on 60 days' notice” Source: Microsoft Customer Agreement (published) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Customer may terminate for convenience anytime on notice; Google 30 days' notice for GCP; data access terminates on termination unless otherwise stated
“Google may terminate this Agreement or any applicable Order Form for its convenience at…” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Site terms: provider may withdraw without notice; post-termination data deleted per retention policies; no retrieval window stated
“all Processed Customer Data shall be deleted pursuant to CoreWeave's retention and deletion policies” Source: CoreWeave Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Either party may terminate when no Orders in effect; on termination Lambda may delete Customer Property without obligation; no retrieval window stated
“Where there are no Orders in effect, either Party may terminate this Agreement” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Both sides for convenience; Crusoe 30 days' notice; on termination access to Customer Data terminates (no stated retrieval window)
“Crusoe may terminate this Agreement for its convenience at any time with 30 days’…” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Provider may terminate; customer cannot terminate without written consent; no post-termination data window stated
“You may not cancel or terminate this Agreement without our express written consent” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Termination for breach with 30-day cure; non-renewal 60 days' notice; 20-day post-termination data retrieval window
“For twenty (20) days after the end of the Term...Baseten will make Customer Content…” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Provider may terminate without cause on notice; user may terminate anytime by closing account; no post-termination data-retrieval window specified
“right to terminate these Terms of Use or your access to the Service at…” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Either side may terminate for convenience at any time; provider has no obligation to retain account data. DPA: return/deletion within 30 days of termination on written request
“You may terminate your use or participation at any time, for any reason” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Unilateral modification |
AWS may modify at any time by posting; effective on posting or as stated in email
“We may modify this Agreement (including any Policies) at any time by posting a…” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Microsoft may update terms; at least 60 days' notice for General Terms changes; SLA 90 days for adverse changes
“notified at least 60 days before changes take effect to these General Terms” Source: Microsoft Customer Agreement (published) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Google may update; material GCP updates effective 30 days after posting; law/new-functionality updates immediate
“material updates to this Agreement will become effective 30 days after they are posted” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Provider may change terms in sole discretion; effective immediately on posting; no advance notice
“All changes are effective immediately when we post them” Source: CoreWeave Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-17
|
Provider may update; Cloud updates bind at next billing cycle; website Terms changes effective 10 days after posting
“the updated version of this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties at the…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Crusoe may change terms; material changes effective 30 days after posting; new functionality/DPST/legal changes effective immediately
“material changes to the Agreement will become effective 30 days after they are posted” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Terms may change; amendments require both parties' written assent; privacy changes effective on posting
“This Agreement may be subject to change in the future” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Baseten may change Terms at sole discretion; material changes effective on acceptance or next renewal; email/website notice attempted
“Baseten may change these Terms from time to time at its sole discretion” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Provider may change terms in sole discretion; effective on posting/continued use; only 'Last Updated' date updated
“make changes or modifications to these Terms of Use from time to time” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Provider may modify unilaterally; changes effective on posting; no specific notice, user waives right to specific notice
“Modifications to this Agreement shall be effective after posting.” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Governing law & disputes |
Governing law and forum vary by AWS Contracting Party. For Amazon Web Services, Inc. (US): Washington State law, King County, WA courts. Disputes are subject to binding arbitration (AAA commercial rules) and a class-action waiver (individual basis only).
“any dispute resolution proceedings will be conducted only on an individual basis” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Governing law Washington State; venue varies (King County or Ireland); no arbitration clause stated for enterprise
“governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington” Source: Microsoft Customer Agreement (published) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
California law; exclusive venue Santa Clara County courts; no arbitration; no class-action waiver stated
“GOVERNED BY CALIFORNIA LAW... LITIGATED EXCLUSIVELY IN THE FEDERAL OR STATE COURTS OF SANTA…” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
New York law; NY courts; arbitration at Company's discretion (AAA); class-action waiver yes
“resolved individually, without resort to any form of class action” Source: CoreWeave Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-17
|
California law; AAA arbitration (yes); class-action waiver (yes); N.D. Cal / Santa Clara County courts if non-arbitrable
“The Parties agree to arbitrate all claims arising out of this Agreement” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
New York law; venue Denver County, Colorado courts; litigation (no arbitration stated); no class-action waiver stated
“GOVERNED BY NEW YORK LAW ... LITIGATED EXCLUSIVELY IN THE FEDERAL OR STATE COURTS…” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
California law; no arbitration or class-action waiver stated
“governed by the laws of the State of California” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Delaware law; courts of New Castle County, Delaware; no arbitration stated; no class-action waiver stated
“governed and interpreted by and under the laws of the State of Delaware” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Governing law Delaware; litigation venue New Jersey; binding arbitration yes (NAM); class-action waiver yes
“resolved exclusively by final and binding arbitration” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Governing law California; binding JAMS arbitration in Los Angeles; class-action waiver yes
“shall be governed by the laws of California... submitted to binding arbitration with... JAMS” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Liability caps & carveouts |
Cap = amounts paid in 12 months before liability arose; carveout for Section 7 indemnity payment obligations; consequential damages waived
“WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU TO AWS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT FOR…” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Cap = 12 months' subscription fees; consequential damages waived; carveouts for confidentiality, IP, defense obligations
“total amount of subscription fees Customer paid to use the Product during the 12…” Source: Microsoft Customer Agreement (published) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Cap = fees paid in 12 months before event ($5,000 for free); indirect/consequential waived; carveouts: IP, indemnity, payment, fraud
“limited to the Fees Customer paid for such Services during the 12 month period…” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Site terms disclaim all liability, no dollar cap stated; indirect/consequential damages waived; no carveouts stated
“WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND” Source: CoreWeave Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-17
|
Cap = fees paid in prior 12 months; indemnification obligations carved out; consequential/indirect damages waived
“EXCEED THE AMOUNTS ACTUALLY PAID BY AND DUE FROM CUSTOMER HEREUNDER DURING THE TWELVE…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Cap = fees paid in 12 months prior (free services $1,000); indirect/consequential waived; carveouts: fraud, indemnity, IP infringement, payment
“limited to the Fees Customer paid during the 12 month period before the event…” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Cap = fees paid in 12 months preceding claim; carveouts for indemnity, gross negligence, willful misconduct, IP; consequential damages waived
“any aggregate liability in excess of the amounts paid by customer during the twelve…” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Cap = fees paid in 12 months preceding; consequential/indirect damages waived; no express carveouts stated
“WILL NOT EXCEED THE FEES PAID BY CUSTOMER TO BASETEN DURING THE TWELVE (12)…” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Cap = lesser of fees paid in prior 6 months or $100; indirect/consequential waived; carveout for death/personal injury negligence, fraud
“LIMITED TO THE LESSER OF THE AMOUNT PAID, IF ANY, BY YOU TO US…” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Cap: amounts paid in 3 months prior to cause of action; indirect/consequential and lost data damages waived; no stated carveouts
“LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID... DURING THE PERIOD OF THREE (3) MONTHS PRIOR” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Output IP indemnification |
Yes for Indemnified Generative AI Services; not subject to damages cap; conditions on filters/no fine-tuning/no known infringement
“AWS will defend you... against any third-party claim alleging that the Generative AI Output” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Yes via Customer Copyright Commitment for Covered Products; conditions require safety systems on
“Microsoft's obligation to defend Customer against third-party intellectual property claims” Source: Microsoft Product Terms for Online Services · fetched 2026-08-01
|
Yes for paid Generative AI Indemnified Services; conditions: use safety tools, notice, necessary rights
“also apply to allegations that an unmodified Generated Output from a Generative AI Indemnified…” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
No output IP indemnity; infringement indemnity covers the Services, not model outputs
“alleging that the use of the Services in accordance with the terms and conditions…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
not specified; IP indemnity covers Services/Brand Features, no output-specific indemnity
“any Service or any Crusoe Brand Feature ... infringes the third party’s Intellectual Property…” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
IP defense for use of Services infringing US patent/copyright/trade secret, capped at $1,000,000; not for third-party model claims
“the use of the Services as permitted hereunder infringes or misappropriates a United States…” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
IP indemnity covers Baseten Products & Services infringement; no specific output/Customer Model Output indemnity; Customer Content excluded
“alleging that the Baseten Products & Services infringes such third party's patents, copyrights or…” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No output IP indemnification offered; provider indemnified by customer only
“You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold us harmless” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Touched but no clear term
“SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY... WARRANTIES... WITH RESPECT TO... NON-INFRINGEMENT” Reviewed Vast.ai Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: language touches this area but sets no clear term. Documents reviewed (3)
Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Model deprecation & version pinning |
Contractual: 12 months' prior notice before discontinuing material functionality of a Service
“We will provide you at least 12 months' prior notice before discontinuing a material…” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Contractual: at least 12 months' notice before discontinuing a Service unless replaced; Provisioned Throughput 6 months
“Google will notify Customer at least 12 months before: (i) discontinuing any Service” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Lambda Terms of Service and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Documented policy: 90 days' notice before discontinuing a Service or backwards-incompatible API change; version pinning not specified
“notify Customer at least 90 days before discontinuing any Service” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Together AI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Baseten Service Level Agreement and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Runpod Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Vast.ai Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
| Benchmarking & eval restrictions |
Permitted but conditioned: must disclose all info to replicate and allow AWS to benchmark your products
“You may perform benchmarks or comparative tests or evaluations (each, a “Benchmark”)” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Consent/conditions required; competitors must waive restrictions and provide replication info
“provide: (a) all information necessary to replicate such Benchmark” Source: Microsoft Product Terms for Online Services · fetched 2026-08-01
|
Permitted with conditions (must publish replication info + allow Google reciprocal); prohibited on behalf of hyperscaler without consent
“publicly disclose the results of such Tests only if (i) the public disclosure includes…” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
Prohibited: may not monitor the Services for benchmarking or competitive purpose
“monitor the Services for any benchmarking or competitive purpose” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Reverse-engineering to find limitations/vulnerabilities prohibited except as permitted; benchmarking not directly addressed
“to test or reverse-engineer the Services in order to find limitations or vulnerabilities” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Prohibited
“engage in competitive analysis or benchmarking” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Baseten Service Level Agreement and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
Silent on benchmarking; Marketplace reviews restricted re competitors and disparagement
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Vast.ai Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
| No-compete-training clauses |
any-model-training restricted (may not use AI Service output to train a model or develop similar service)
“you may not use an AI Service to generate Content for the express purpose…” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Restricted: may not generate output as synthetic training data for substantially similar AI
“creating synthetic training data to develop or train AI models” Source: Microsoft Product Terms for Online Services · fetched 2026-08-01
|
any-model-training restricted: cannot use output to create/improve models similar to a Google Model
“create or improve models similar to a Google Model” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
Prohibited from accessing Services to build a similar/competitive product; no explicit output-training clause
“access any portion of the Services for the purpose of building a similar or…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
silent as to using outputs to train other models
|
competing-models-only (via prohibition on developing competitive product/service)
“develop a product or service that is competitive with the Company's products” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
competing-models-only (restriction on building similar/competitive product or service)
“access or use the Baseten Products & Services to build a similar or competitive…” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No use of Service to compete with provider; not specifically model-training
“Use the Service as part of any effort to compete with us.” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
competing-models-only; may not use services to develop/train competing or similar products
“develop, train, or improve any competing or similar product or service” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Capacity delivery remedies |
Capacity Blocks/Spot may be terminated for AWS capacity requirements; refund for terminated Spot Block; RIs pro rata refund only if AWS terminates
“Spot Instances and Spot Blocks may also be terminated for AWS capacity requirements” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Capacity Blocks: service credits for failure to provision reserved capacity; credits sole remedy
“failures to Provision or make available the reserved capacity within a Capacity Block” Source: SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) · fetched 2026-07-15
|
Committed Units: refund of unused prepaid Fees if Google non-renews/terminates/discontinues; delivery commitment silent
“Google will refund Customer any unused prepaid Fees following the expiration or termination” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
not specified; Services provided as-is with no delivery commitment
“THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED "AS-IS"” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
not specified; no firm delivery commitment or capacity-shortfall remedy published
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Together AI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Scaling beyond provisioned/committed capacity excluded from SLA; no delivery remedy stated for reserved capacity
“it does not measure Customer's ability to scale beyond its provisioned or committed capacity” Source: Baseten Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No uptime warranty for Community Cloud; no committed-capacity delivery remedy published
“does not make any specific uptime warranties with respect to the Community Cloud” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
silent; no availability guarantee, no liability for downtime
“Company shall have no liability whatsoever for any loss... during any downtime” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Hardware substitution rights |
EC2 resources may be terminated or replaced due to failure, retirement or other AWS requirements
“your Amazon EC2 resources may be terminated or replaced due to failure, retirement or…” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Capacity adjustments allowed provided no delay or adverse impact on cost/functionality/performance
“such actions do not delay delivery of the applicable capacity or adversely impact its…” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
not specified for cloud; hardware RMA replacements may be new, refurbished, or similar versions
“replaced by new, refurbished, or similar versions of the same components” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
silent; Crusoe may make changes/updates to Services but no explicit hardware substitution clause
“Crusoe may make changes, updates or enhancements to the Services” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Together AI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Baseten Service Level Agreement and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Runpod Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Vast.ai Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
| Assignment & financing clauses |
AWS may assign without consent (merger/affiliate/reorg); customer needs consent; no lender step-in language
“We may assign this Agreement without your consent” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Assignment to Affiliate allowed with notice; payment rights assignable without notice; no lender step-in stated
“Either party may assign this Agreement to an Affiliate” Source: Microsoft Customer Agreement (published) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Consent-required except to Affiliate; no lender step-in/financing language
“Neither party may assign any part of this Agreement without the written consent of…” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
Customer may not assign; Lambda may assign to affiliates or via merger/acquisition without consent; no financing/step-in language
“Lambda may assign this Agreement in its entirety, together with all rights and obligations…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Crusoe may freely assign; customer needs consent (except M&A); lender/investor language present in Confidential Information
“Crusoe may freely assign this Agreement and any order or part of this Agreement” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Consent required except to successor of all/substantially all assets; no lender step-in language
“Neither party hereto may assign this Agreement without the other party's prior written consent” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Consent required except merger/acquisition/asset sale/operation of law; no lender step-in/financing language
“either party may assign this Agreement in connection with a merger, acquisition, reorganization or…” Source: Baseten Terms and Conditions · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Provider may assign any or all rights at any time; no lender step-in language
“We may assign any or all of our rights and obligations to others at…” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Provider assignment unrestricted; customer needs consent; no financing/step-in language
“Company may assign any or all of its rights and obligations to others at…” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Availability definition |
instance-level (99.5%) and region-level (99.99%) based on external connectivity
“Monthly Uptime Percentage of at least 99.99%” Source: Amazon Compute Service Level Agreement (EC2/ECS/Fargate) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Per-service; Virtual Machines instance/AZ-level connectivity-based; e.g. 99.99% multi-AZ, 99.9% single-instance Premium SSD
“Downtime is the total accumulated minutes that are part of Maximum Available Minutes that…” Source: SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) · fetched 2026-07-15
|
instance-level and multi-zone; 99.99% multi-zone, 99.95% memory-optimized single, 99.9% other single (Premium)
“Instances in Multiple Zones >= 99.99%” Source: Compute Engine Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-14
|
no SLA / uptime not committed (site terms disclaim availability)
“We will not be liable if for any reason all or any part of…” Source: CoreWeave Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-17
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
“WE DO NOT WARRANT THAT THE SITE OR ANY SERVICE... WILL BE TIMELY, SECURE,…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
unclear; Agreement references SLAs but SLA text not in provided document (truncated)
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
“No guarantees are made with respect to the Services' quality, stability, uptime, or reliability” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
instance/service-level System Availability; 99.9% monthly commitment (commercially reasonable efforts)
“System Availability...equals or exceeds ninety-nine point nine percent (99.9%) during each calendar month” Source: Baseten Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No SLA / uptime not committed (Community Cloud expressly no uptime warranty; Service as-is)
“THE SERVICE ... ARE PROVIDED ON AN AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE BASIS” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
“Company cannot guarantee the Website and that Company Services will be always available.” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Credit regime |
Region: <99.99%=10%, <99.0%=30%, <95.0%=100%; Instance same tiers; sole and exclusive remedy
“this SLA sets forth your sole and exclusive remedies” Source: Amazon Compute Service Level Agreement (EC2/ECS/Fargate) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Tiered e.g. VM <99.9%=10%, <99%=25%, <95%=100%; credits sole and exclusive remedy
“Service Credits are your sole and exclusive remedy for any performance or availability issues” Source: SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) · fetched 2026-07-15
|
Tiered: 99.00-<99.99%=10%, 95.00-<99.00%=25%, <95.00%=100%; sole and exclusive remedy
“This SLA states Customer's sole and exclusive remedy for any failure by Google to…” Source: Compute Engine Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-14
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
No uptime SLA credits; discretionary credits only, no monetary value, expire 12 months
“Credits have no monetary or cash value” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
unclear; SLA credit structure not in provided (truncated) text; SLA credits noted as not Promotional Offerings
“credits issued pursuant to any SLA are not Promotional Offerings” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Together AI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Service credits per table; max 40% of monthly amount; credits applied to future use; SLA sole remedy
“maximum amount of Service Credits...will not exceed forty percent (40%) of the amount due” Source: Baseten Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Runpod Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
not specified; no service credits, refunds discretionary only
“All payments for credits spent... are final and no refunds shall be issued.” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Claim mechanics |
Must file claim via AWS Support Center by end of second billing cycle after incident; must include dates, resource IDs, logs
“must be received by us by the end of the second billing cycle after…” Source: Amazon Compute Service Level Agreement (EC2/ECS/Fargate) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Must file claim; Azure within 60 days of Incident; supply detailed description, time, resources, errors
“For a claim related to Microsoft Azure, we must receive the claim within 60…” Source: SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) · fetched 2026-07-15
|
Customer must request within 60 days of eligibility; must provide log files showing Downtime Periods and dates/times
“notify Google technical support within 60 days from the time Customer becomes eligible” Source: Compute Engine Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-14
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
not specified (no SLA credit claim process)
|
unclear; SLA claim mechanics not in provided text (truncated)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Together AI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Customer must email billing@baseten.co within 24 hours of downtime with incident description and duration evidence
“to billing@baseten.co within twenty four hours following such Unscheduled Downtime” Source: Baseten Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Runpod Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Vast.ai Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
| SLA exclusions |
Force majeure/external network, customer fault/equipment, suspension/termination-related; beta excluded elsewhere
“caused by factors outside of our reasonable control, including any force majeure event” Source: Amazon Compute Service Level Agreement (EC2/ECS/Fargate) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Force majeure, customer fault, preview/beta, single-datacenter non-geo-resilient, throttling, external network
“Due to factors outside our reasonable control (for example, natural disaster” Source: SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) · fetched 2026-07-15
|
Pre-GA/beta features, factors outside Google's control, customer/third-party hardware or software, AUP abuses, quotas
“errors (i) caused by factors outside of Google's reasonable control; (ii) that resulted from…” Source: Compute Engine Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-14
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
No SLA; force majeure clause present; planned downtime for maintenance noted
“Lambda may temporarily suspend access to the Services during planned downtime for upgrades and…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Promotional/free offerings excluded from SLA (reasonable-efforts basis); force majeure clause present; full SLA exclusions truncated
“the SLAs do not apply to Services made available during a Promotional Offering” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No SLA; force majeure clause present
“cessation, interruption, or delay in the performance of its obligations due to causes beyond…” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Force majeure, customer fault/misuse, scheduled maintenance, third-party hosting failures, internet/network, throttling/capacity
“throttling, rate-limiting, queuing, or reduced throughput resulting from capacity that is not reserved” Source: Baseten Service Level Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Runpod Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
no SLA published; force majeure clause present (causes beyond reasonable control)
“any cause beyond Company's reasonable control” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| International data transfer mechanism |
EU SCCs (2021/914) controller-to-processor and processor-to-processor; UK IDTA; Swiss addendum; EU-US Data Privacy Framework (privacy notice)
“incorporate the Standard Contractual Clauses between controllers and processors” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Standard Contractual Clauses; EU-US/UK/Swiss Data Privacy Frameworks; adequacy decisions
“standard contractual clauses approved by the European Commission” Source: Microsoft Privacy Statement · fetched 2026-07-31
|
SCCs (EU C2P/P2P/P2C), UK Addendum, Swiss, Turkish SCCs, Brazil SCCs; Alternative Transfer Solution referenced
“the SCCs (Controller-to-Processor) or SCCs (Processor-to-Processor) will apply” Source: Cloud Data Processing Addendum (CDPA) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
SCCs (EU Controller-to-Processor and Processor-to-Processor), UK IDTA, Swiss SCCs; transfer impact assessment referenced
“the standard contractual clauses between controllers and processors” Source: CoreWeave Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Relies primarily on EU Standard Contractual Clauses; may also rely on adequacy decisions or derogations
“We rely primarily on the European Commission's Standard Contractual Clauses” Source: Lambda Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
SCCs and UK International Data Transfer Agreement named; DPST provides for EU/UK/Swiss SCCs
“we rely on data transfer mechanisms such as the Standard Contractual Clauses” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
EU Standard Contractual Clauses plus additional safeguards
“including the European Commission-approved standard contractual clauses” Source: Together AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
SCCs (Decision (EU) 2021/914) for EU transfers; UK Transfer Addendum for UK; adequacy referenced; SCCs governed by Irish law
““SCCs” means the standard contractual clauses approved by the European Commission” Source: Baseten Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
EU SCCs (Module Two), UK Addendum, Swiss/FADP addendum, Brazilian SCCs; no adequacy for US; no DPF named
“Any Restricted Transfer shall be subject to the Standard Contractual Clauses and/or the UK…” Source: Runpod Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-30
|
SCCs (EU Module 2 Controller-to-Processor) and UK IDTA Addendum; adequacy decisions referenced; no DPF named
“the Parties hereby agree to and incorporate the Standard Contractual Clauses into this Agreement.” Source: Vast.ai Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Data residency commitments |
Customer selects regions; AWS will not move Your Content from selected regions except to comply with law
“we will not (a) disclose Your Content... or (b) move Your Content from the…” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Reserves global processing; may store/process in US and other jurisdictions
“stored and processed in your region, in the United States, and in any other…” Source: Microsoft Privacy Statement · fetched 2026-07-31
|
Contractual: for listed Services, Customer selects Region/Multi-Region and Google stores at rest only there
“Google will store Customer Data for that Service at rest only within the selected…” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No regional commitment stated; transfers permitted via valid mechanisms, global processing reserved
“only transfer that Personal Data to CoreWeave under the following conditions” Source: CoreWeave Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Data hosted in US; Lambda may transfer/store in other regions at its sole discretion unless Order states otherwise
“Lambda may transfer and store Customer Property in other geographic regions or jurisdictions at…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Reserves global processing; Customer Data may be processed in any country where Crusoe/subprocessors maintain facilities, subject to data location commitments
“Customer Data may be processed in any country in which Crusoe or its Subprocessors…” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No regional commitment; global processing reserved
“transferred to, and maintained on, computers located outside of your state, province, country” Source: Together AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No regional commitment; global processing reserved (processed at operating offices and other places)
“information may be transferred to - and maintained on - computers located outside of…” Source: Baseten Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No firm commitment; reasonable efforts to allocate proximate region; global processing reserved; Serverless can restrict to specific data centers
“Runpod will use reasonable efforts to allocate a server in a geographically proximate location” Source: Runpod Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No regional commitment; reserves global processing/transfer as necessary; data processed in United States
“transfer Personal Data to any country or territory, as reasonably necessary” Source: Vast.ai Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Sub-processor transparency |
Published sub-processor list; AWS updates page at least 30 days before engaging new sub-processor; email notification if subscribed
“AWS will update this page at least 30 days before engaging a new sub-processor” Source: AWS Sub-processors · fetched 2026-07-29
|
Subprocessor list published; names of new subprocessors published at least six months in advance
“names of any new subprocessors for its online services at least six months in…” Source: Microsoft Online Services Subprocessor List · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Published list; 30 days' advance notice of new subprocessors; objection right via termination for convenience within 90 days
“at least 30 days before the New Subprocessor starts processing any Customer Data, notify…” Source: Cloud Data Processing Addendum (CDPA) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
List published; 30-day advance notice of changes; objection right within 15 days on data-protection grounds
“send a notice to Customer at least 30 days in advance” Source: CoreWeave Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Subcontractors may be used; no published list, no advance-notice or objection right stated
“Lambda may use Subcontractors, who may access Customer Property, to provide, secure and improve…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Subprocessor list published at URL; general authorization for new subprocessors; no explicit advance-notice window or objection right stated
“Information about Subprocessors, including their functions and locations, is available” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No published sub-processor list; shares with service providers/vendors; no notice or objection right stated
“share your Personal Data with Service Providers, Third-Party Vendors, Consultants” Source: Together AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
List published at trust.baseten.co; 15 days' advance notice of new sub-processors; objection within 5 days
“notify Customer if it engages a new Sub-Processor at least fifteen (15) days prior” Source: Baseten Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
List published (Attachment 2); confidential sub-processors allowed; objection right within 10 business days; termination if unresolved
“Customer shall inform Runpod, in writing, of objections to any new Sub-Processors” Source: Runpod Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-30
|
List provided (Stripe, Google, Meta, Twitter, Microsoft); new subprocessor list given upon reasonable request; no advance notice window or objection right stated
“give Controller a list of any new Subprocessors engaged after the date... upon reasonable…” Source: Vast.ai Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Government access commitments |
Notice of legal orders unless prohibited by law; discloses only to comply with law or binding government order
“we will give you notice of any legal requirement or order referred to in…” Source: AWS Customer Agreement · fetched 2026-08-15
|
No back doors; imposes special requirements for government requests; transparency report published
“no direct or unfettered government access to your data” Source: Microsoft Online Services Subprocessor List · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Challenge unlawful requests; notify data subject/exporter where possible; Transparency Report published; no backdoor
“The data importer agrees to review the legality of the request for disclosure” Source: Google Cloud Third Party Subprocessors · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Via SCCs: notify data exporter/subject of legally binding requests, review legality and challenge unlawful requests; no transparency report stated
“to challenge the request if, after careful assessment, it concludes” Source: CoreWeave Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Compelled disclosure with prior notice if legally permitted; no commitment to challenge; no transparency report
“it shall provide the Disclosing Party with prior notice of such compelled disclosure (if…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Will challenge non-binding/invalid law-enforcement requests, notify customer unless prohibited, provide only responsive info; no transparency report stated
“Crusoe shall challenge any request that is not binding and valid, provide Customer with…” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Commits to notify customer of law-enforcement requests unless legally prohibited; no transparency report stated
“we will promptly notify you and provide you with a copy of the request” Source: Together AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
May disclose Personal Data if required by law or valid public-authority requests; notice before business-transfer transfers; no challenge commitment or transparency report
“required to disclose Your Personal Data if required to do so by law or…” Source: Baseten Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Cooperates with law enforcement, may notify authorities; no commitment to challenge or notify customer; no transparency report
“Runpod will cooperate with law enforcement authorities and reserves the right to notify such…” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Under SCCs data importer must notify data exporter of binding disclosure requests, review legality and challenge unlawful requests; no transparency report mentioned
“It will challenge any request seen as unlawful and seek interim measures” Source: Vast.ai Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Retention & human review of content |
Bedrock abuse detection stores inputs/outputs up to 30 days and may review for policy violations
“Amazon Bedrock stores Service inputs and outputs for up to 30 days” Source: AWS Service Terms · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Automated classifiers run to detect AUP/Code of Conduct violations; personnel access granted only when necessary
“run automated classifiers and other automated evaluation systems to detect violations” Source: Microsoft Product Terms for Online Services · fetched 2026-08-01
|
Automated safety tools; prompts may be logged for abuse review; humans may review to detect violations
“Google may log Customer prompts solely for the purpose of reviewing and determining whether…” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
AUP: CoreWeave may investigate, review and preserve customer info during AUP investigations; no retention window stated
“disclosing, reviewing and preserving appropriate customer information” Source: CoreWeave Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-17
|
Lambda reserves right to monitor use and Customer Property for enumerated purposes; no retention window stated
“Lambda reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor the use of the…” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Crusoe may review Customer Applications or Customer Data to investigate AUP violations; retention timeframes set per purpose
“which may include reviewing Customer Applications or Customer Data” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
Provider may monitor use to assess compliance and quality; retention only as necessary; ZDR available
“monitor your use of the Services to assess compliance with this Agreement” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Baseten may use Service Data to investigate fraud/unlawful use; no explicit human review of Customer Content stated
“to investigate fraud, spam, wrongful or unlawful use of the Services” Source: Baseten Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Provider may access/store/process Your Content and may electronically monitor network; no stated retention window
“may elect to electronically monitor its network and may disclose any content” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Provider reserves right to monitor Website for violations; retains some PII to prevent fraud/troubleshoot; no specific retention window for content
“Monitor the Website for violations of this Agreement” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Prohibited high-risk uses |
Weapons lethal function without human control prohibited; Rekognition law enforcement surveillance restrictions; unlawful tracking/identification prohibited
“to perform a lethal function in a weapon without human authorization or control” Source: AWS Responsible AI Policy · fetched 2026-07-14
|
AUP prohibits illegal use, harming minors; high-risk use disclaimed but not specific FR/policing list
“Intending to harm or exploit minors in any way” Source: Microsoft Acceptable Use Policy (Online Services) · fetched 2026-07-14
|
Celebrity recognition not for surveillance; weapons via Maps prohibited; no High Risk Activities; facial recognition surveillance restricted
“only with professionally-filmed media content that Customer owns or is authorized to use, and…” Source: Google Cloud Service Specific Terms (AI/ML data use) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
AUP prohibits illegal, violent, harassing, terrorism-promoting content; no facial recognition/predictive policing/biometric/weapons terms named
“incites or threatens violence against any person, promotes terrorism” Source: CoreWeave Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-17
|
Prohibits weapons (nuclear/chemical/biological/missiles), crypto-mining, high-risk life-critical uses; no facial recognition/predictive policing named
“nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons, weapons of mass destruction, or missiles” Source: Lambda Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
AUP prohibits illegal activity incl. terrorism/violence, NCEI, CSAM; High Risk Activities (weaponry, nuclear) restricted; facial recognition/predictive policing not named
“terrorism or violence that can cause death, serious harm, or injury” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No specific high-risk use list; general prohibitions on unlawful/infringing/criminal content
“encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense” Source: Together AI Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Not specified in provided documents (Acceptable Use Policy referenced in Trust Center but not included)
|
AUP prohibits illegal use, adult content, CSAM; no explicit facial recognition/predictive policing/biometric/weapons list
“pornography or graphic adult content, images, or other adult products” Source: Runpod Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No high-risk-use list; export controls prohibit nuclear/missile/chemical/biological weapons and military end-use in China/Russia end-uses
“nuclear, missile, chemical or biological weapons, or military end-use in China/Russia” Source: Vast.ai Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
| Appeal & redress mechanisms |
No provision (9 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Amazon Compute Service Level Agreement (EC2/ECS/Fargate) and 8 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (9)
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
For GWS/Cloud Identity suspensions Google gives Administrator ability to restore accounts; will notify basis on request
“Google will provide Customer's Administrator the ability to restore End User Accounts in certain…” Source: Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-14
|
SCCs require a complaint contact point for data subjects; no account-suspension appeal path stated
“a contact point authorised to handle complaints” Source: CoreWeave Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
not specified; suspension/termination at Lambda's discretion, no stated appeal path
|
DMCA counter-notification path exists; AUP violations get notice and 24h to correct; suspension basis provided on request; no formal appeal timeline
“notify Customer of the basis for the Suspension as soon as is reasonably possible” Source: Crusoe Legal Center (Cloud Platform Terms of Service) · fetched 2026-08-11
|
No appeal path for suspensions; privacy rights via privacy@together.ai; deletion denials notified
“The Company will notify you promptly if it determines it must deny your deletion…” Source: Together AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Baseten Service Level Agreement and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
No dedicated appeal path for suspensions/flags; informal dispute resolution and support email referenced
|
No appeal path for suspensions; DPA/SCC provides data-subject complaint contact point and supervisory authority complaints; copyright counter-notice not detailed
“of a contact point authorised to handle complaints. It shall deal promptly” Source: Vast.ai Data Processing Agreement · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| EU AI Act role allocation |
Places compliance responsibility on customer; references EU AI Act as customer's responsibility; no explicit provider/deployer role allocation
“laws specific to artificial intelligence such as the EU AI Act” Source: AWS Responsible AI Policy · fetched 2026-07-14
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed SLA for Microsoft Online Services (consolidated; incl. Azure compute/GPU) and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (8 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Compute Engine Service Level Agreement and 7 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (8)
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed CoreWeave Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
not specified; general controller/processor roles noted but no AI Act role allocation
|
not specified; no EU AI Act provider/deployer role allocation
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Together AI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Baseten Service Level Agreement and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Runpod Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Vast.ai Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Closed Model Providers 5
checked 2026-08-16 02:22 UTC.xlsx
| Term dimension | ClaudeAnthropic | OpenAI API / GPTOpenAI⚠ stale | GeminiGoogle | GrokxAI⚠ stale | CommandCoherepublishes weights (non-commercial license) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity & reservation terms |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Minimum commitments via Order Form; dedicated capacity negotiated, not published
“the minimum commitment amount is non-cancellable except as required by law” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
| Data use & AI training |
Never trains on commercial Customer Content by default; consumer tier trains unless opted out
“Anthropic may not train models on Customer Content from Services.” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Business/API default: does not train on customer content unless customer explicitly agrees (opt-in); ZDR available
“OpenAI will not use Customer Content to develop or improve the Services, unless Customer…” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
Unpaid: trains by default (used to improve products); Paid: not used to improve products. ZDR not offered.
“When you use Paid Services... Google doesn't use your prompts... or responses to improve…” Source: Gemini API Additional Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Trains by default for logged-in consumers, with opt-out toggle; non-logged-in use grants full training rights; deletion queued up to 30 days; ZDR not stated (enterprise DPA allows customer-set retention)
“you can select whether or not you want us to use your User Content…” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Trains by default with opt-out; enterprise tier; inputs/outputs retained 30 days; ZDR enterprise-only
“You can opt out from your prompts and generations being used to train Cohere…” Source: Cohere Enterprise Data Commitments · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Suspension rights |
May suspend for security risk, AUP/use-restriction violation, legal prohibition, or vendor loss; reasonable-efforts notice
“Anthropic may suspend Customer's access to any portion or all of the Services if” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Suspend for legal requirement, Agreement/Policy violation, or Security Emergency; notice generally, but may be immediate
“OpenAI will use reasonable efforts to notify Customer before limiting to or suspending the…” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
May suspend/terminate for AUP or Terms breach, legal compliance, risk/harm, or inactivity; may be immediate without notice
“We may terminate or suspend your access to our Service or delete your account…” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Suspension for maintenance, force majeure, non-payment, ToU/RUG violation, security emergency, or legal/regulatory; discretionary
“if you are delinquent in your payment of fees to Cohere under any agreement” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Termination |
Either party may terminate for convenience with Notice (Anthropic gives 30 days); on termination Customer loses access
“Each party may terminate these Terms at any time for convenience with Notice” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Termination for cause (30-day cure) or insolvency; no general convenience right; data deleted within 30 days post-termination
“OpenAI will delete all Customer Content from its systems within thirty days” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
Customer may terminate for convenience (SCC/subprocessor objection); post-term data deletion after up to 30-day recovery period
“After a recovery period of up to 30 days from that date, Google will…” Source: Google Cloud Data Processing Addendum (Gemini) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
User may stop/close account anytime; provider may terminate anytime; deletion queued up to 30 days; no post-termination data retrieval window stated
“You are free to stop using our Service at any time and close your…” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Provider may terminate any time in sole discretion for any reason; user may terminate anytime; no data retrieval window stated (prompts/generations deleted after 30 days)
“Cohere may... terminate these Terms of Use, in Cohere's sole discretion, for any reason” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Unilateral modification |
Anthropic may update terms, effective 30 days after posting/Notice; law-driven changes immediate; not retroactive
“Anthropic may update these Terms at any time, to be effective 30 days after” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
May update by posting; at least 30 days notice if material impact (except legal-compliance updates)
“OpenAI will provide Customer at least thirty days notice before the update is effective” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
Google may change pricing effective 30 days after posting; continued use = consent
“effective 30 days after they are posted unless otherwise specified” Source: Gemini API Additional Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Provider may modify terms; material changes update 'Effective' date; effective on continued use; 30 days' notice only for price increases
“We reserve the right to modify these Terms.” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Provider may change terms any time; notice via website/email; continued use = acceptance (effective on posting)
“we reserve the right to change any element of these Terms of Use at…” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Governing law & disputes |
California (or Ireland for EEA/UK/CH); binding arbitration yes; class-action waiver yes
“THE RIGHT TO JOIN AND PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
California (Ireland for EEA/CH/UK); binding arbitration via NAM in San Francisco; class-action waiver yes
“resolve any Disputes ... through final and binding arbitration” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
Payment/dispute terms governed by Google Cloud Terms of Service, Section 15 Governing Law and Dispute Resolution; specifics not in these documents
“Governing Law and Dispute Resolution” Source: Gemini API Additional Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Texas law; venue Northern District of Texas / Wichita or Tarrant County; no arbitration stated; class-action and jury waiver yes
“the laws of the State of Texas, excluding its choice of law provisions, will…” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Governing law: Ontario/Canada; venue: courts in Toronto, Ontario; arbitration: no; class-action waiver: not specified
“governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of…” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Liability caps & carveouts |
Cap = fees paid in prior 12 months; indemnity carved out; consequential/indirect damages waived
“limited to Fees paid by Customer for the Services in the previous 12 months” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Cap: fees paid in prior 12 months; carveouts for gross negligence/willful misconduct, indemnity, payment; indirect damages waived
“WILL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT CUSTOMER PAID TO OPENAI DURING THE TWELVE MONTHS” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Cap = greater of amount paid or $100; excludes willful misconduct/gross negligence; indirect/consequential damages waived
“AN AMOUNT EXCEEDING THE AMOUNT YOU PAID TO US HEREUNDER OR ONE HUNDRED U.S.…” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Cap: $100 CAD aggregate; consequential/indirect damages waived; no stated carveouts
“OUR TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY... EXCEED $100 CAD” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Output IP indemnification |
Yes for paid use; uncapped (excluded from liability cap); conditions incl. no modification, no known infringement
“Outputs generated through such authorized use violates any third-party intellectual property right” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Yes, for API and Enterprise customers; not subject to liability cap; conditioned on using safety features and rightful inputs
“is not subject to any liability cap” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No; customer indemnifies xAI, no provider output IP indemnity offered
“you will defend, indemnify, and hold xAI ... harmless” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
| Model deprecation & version pinning |
Documented policy; at least 60 days' notice before retirement; version pinning via dated model IDs
“at least 60 days' notice before model retirement for publicly released models” Source: Anthropic model deprecations · fetched 2026-08-13
|
Documented policy: GA models >=6 months notice, specialized variants >=3 months, preview ~2 weeks; dedicated capacity may extend access
“Generally available models: At least 6 months.” Source: OpenAI deprecations · fetched 2026-08-12
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Touched but no clear term
“we reserve the right to change any element of the Cohere Solution at any…” Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: language touches this area but sets no clear term. Documents reviewed (4)
Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Benchmarking & eval restrictions |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Silent (no explicit benchmarking/eval publication restriction found)
“not specified”
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Prohibited
“YOU MAY NOT ACCESS THE COHERE SOLUTION FOR PURPOSES OF... BENCHMARKING OR COMPETITIVE PURPOSES” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| No-compete-training clauses |
competing-models-only (restricts building competing product / training competing AI models)
“build a competing product or service, including to train competing AI models” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
competing-models-only; Permitted Exception for non-distributed classifiers and OpenAI fine-tuning
“use Output to develop artificial intelligence models that compete with OpenAI's products” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
competing-models-only (may not develop models that compete with the Services)
“You may not use the Services to develop models that compete with the Services” Source: Gemini API Additional Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
any-model-training prohibited (develop competing ML models or any products/services)
“Using the Service or any Output to develop ... machine learning models or any…” Source: xAI Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-08-15
|
competing-models-only
“for the purpose of building a similar or competitive product or service” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Capacity delivery remedies |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Silent (no committed-capacity delivery commitment or remedy published)
“not specified”
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
| Assignment & financing clauses |
Consent required, except Anthropic may assign to affiliate or in sale of business; no financing/step-in language
“Anthropic may assign its rights and delegate its obligations to an affiliate or as…” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Assignment to affiliate without consent, or to successor with 30 days notice; no financing/lender step-in language
“OpenAI may assign this Agreement to an Affiliate without notice or Customer consent” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Provider may assign without restriction; customer may not assign; no financing/step-in language
“may be assigned by us without restriction” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Provider may assign without consent; customer may not assign without consent; no financing/step-in language
“We may assign these Terms of Use or any rights... without your consent” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Availability definition |
no SLA / uptime not committed
“THEIR USE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED” Source: Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
“OPENAI MAKES NO REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE THAT SERVICES WILL MEET” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
“DO NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE FUNCTIONS OR FEATURES OF THE SERVICE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
no SLA / uptime not committed
“THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE"” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Credit regime |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Touched but no clear term
“not specified” Reviewed OpenAI Service Terms and 6 other governing documents: language touches this area but sets no clear term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Touched but no clear term
“COHERE WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO ISSUE A REFUND FOR ANY PURCHASE” Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: language touches this area but sets no clear term. Documents reviewed (4)
Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Claim mechanics |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
not specified (SLA); invoice disputes must be raised within 30 days
“contact ar-enterprise@openai.com within thirty days” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
| SLA exclusions |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No SLA; force majeure clause present excluding liability for events beyond control
“failures or delays resulting from conditions beyond Customer's or OpenAI's reasonable control” Source: OpenAI Business Terms · fetched 2026-08-16
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
| International data transfer mechanism |
Relies on adequacy decisions and Standard Contractual Clauses; ANPD-approved SCCs for Brazil
“We rely on standard contractual clauses to transfer information” Source: Anthropic Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
SCCs for EEA/Swiss transfers and among affiliates; UK Addendum; adequacy decisions referenced
“agreements containing SCCs that ensure appropriate safeguards” Source: OpenAI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
SCCs (EU C2P/P2P/P2C modules), UK Addendum, Swiss FDPA terms, Turkish SCCs, Brazil SCCs; Alternative Transfer Solution referenced
“the SCCs (Controller-to-Processor) or SCCs (Processor-to-Processor) will apply” Source: Google Cloud Data Processing Addendum (Gemini) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
SCCs (EU Modules 2/3), UK Addendum, Swiss FADP modifications; no Data Privacy Framework named
“the SCCs shall be incorporated and form an integral part of the DPA” archived capture · 2026-07-14 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Data Processing Addendum |
Standard Contractual Clauses; EU-US Data Privacy Framework (incl. UK extension); adequacy decisions; Transfer Impact Assessment conducted
“The DPA incorporates the Standard Contractual Clauses, approved by the European Commission” Source: Cohere Sub-processors (Trust Center) · fetched 2026-08-04
|
| Data residency commitments |
No regional-processing commitment; reserves global processing/transfer to US and other countries
“your personal data is transferred to our servers in the US, or to other…” Source: Anthropic Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No general regional-processing commitment; global processing via subprocessors; ZDR option affects retention only
“OpenAI may Process Customer Data on behalf of Customer” Source: OpenAI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Reserves global processing; data may be processed in any country, subject to data location commitments in Service Specific Terms
“Customer Data may be processed in any country where Google or its Subprocessors maintain…” Source: Google Cloud Data Processing Addendum (Gemini) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
No regional commitment; reserves global processing including US and other countries
“xAI may transfer and process Personal Data outside Europe as necessary to provide the…” archived capture · 2026-07-14 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Data Processing Addendum |
Hosting in Google Cloud US-Central; no servers outside US; reserves global processing; ephemeral config available
“Our hosting centers are on Google Cloud Platform servers located in US-Central” Source: Cohere Sub-processors (Trust Center) · fetched 2026-08-04
|
| Sub-processor transparency |
Sub-processor list published in Trust Center; no stated advance-notice window or objection right
“All subprocessors” Source: Anthropic Sub-processors · fetched 2026-07-21
|
Published list; notice of changes via blog/service/email; 30-day objection right
“Customer may object to the use of such additional Sub-processor within 30 days” Source: OpenAI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Published list; 30 days advance notice of new subprocessors; objection right within 90 days by terminating for convenience
“at least 30 days before the New Subprocessor starts processing any Customer Data, notify…” Source: Google Cloud Data Processing Addendum (Gemini) · fetched 2026-07-30
|
Subprocessor List published; 15 days' advance notice of changes; objection right on reasonable data-protection grounds
“notify you if we add or replace Subprocessors at least fifteen (15) days before…” archived capture · 2026-07-14 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Data Processing Addendum |
Sub-processor list published at Trust Center; no advance-notice window or objection right stated
“You can view a list of sub-processors by visiting Cohere's Trust Center” Source: Cohere Enterprise Data Commitments · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Government access commitments |
Discloses to government on good-faith belief; transparency hub exists; no stated challenge/notice commitment in privacy policy
“we have a good-faith belief that disclosure is reasonably necessary” Source: Anthropic Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Will inform customer of law-enforcement disclosure requests to the extent legally permitted; no challenge commitment or transparency report referenced here
“inform Customer if OpenAI receives a legally binding request for disclosure” Source: OpenAI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Under SCCs: notify data subject/exporter of public authority requests, review legality and challenge unlawful requests; enterprise transparency report published
“agrees to review the legality of the request for disclosure... and to challenge the…” Source: Google Cloud Third Party Subprocessors (Gemini) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Will review legality and consider challenging; disclose only minimum required; no customer notification commitment or transparency report stated
“we shall review the legality of the request and determine whether the request may…” archived capture · 2026-07-14 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Data Processing Addendum |
Commits to promptly notify customers of government requests unless legally prohibited; no transparency report stated
“Cohere commits to promptly notify customers of any communications received from a governmental agency” Source: Cohere Sub-processors (Trust Center) · fetched 2026-08-04
|
| Retention & human review of content |
Humans may review content flagged for safety; deleted conversations removed from back-end within 30 days
“your conversations are flagged for safety review” Source: Anthropic Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Humans/subprocessors may review flagged content for moderation; samples retained for review period
“OpenAI may share samples of the flagged Customer Content with relevant Sub-processors” Source: OpenAI Sub-processor List · fetched 2026-08-14
|
Unpaid: human reviewers may read/annotate API input/output (disconnected from account); Paid: logs limited period for abuse/security only
“human reviewers may read, annotate, and process your API input and output” Source: Gemini API Additional Terms of Service · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Authorized personnel and automated systems may review User Content for business, safety, compliance purposes; deletion typically within 30 days
“Our authorized personnel may review how you use the Service and your User Content” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Humans may review flagged prompts/generations for abuse/misuse and safety enforcement; 30-day retention
“our safety and security teams may review user prompts, generations, and logs” Source: Cohere Enterprise Data Commitments · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Prohibited high-risk uses |
Prohibits facial recognition surveillance, predictive policing, biometric categorization, weapons development
“facial recognition, battlefield management applications or predictive policing” Source: Anthropic Usage Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Prohibits weapons/CBRNE, facial recognition databases without consent, real-time remote biometric ID, social scoring, criminal-risk prediction by profiling
“real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces” archived capture · 2026-07-25 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: OpenAI Usage Policies |
Prohibits tracking/monitoring without consent, biometrics without consent, and high-risk automated decisions without human supervision; weapons not explicitly listed
“Tracks or monitors people without their consent.” Source: Google Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Prohibits bioweapons/chemical/WMD, high-stakes automated decisions, undressing/deepfakes, facial-likeness misuse; predictive policing/biometric categorization not named
“Develop bioweapons, chemical weapons, or weapons of mass destruction” Source: xAI Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-08-15
|
Weapons prohibited; no facial recognition/predictive policing/biometric terms stated
“result in death, serious personal injury... (such as the creation or operation of weaponry)” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Model documentation commitments |
System cards and model reports published in Transparency Hub; not referenced contractually
“condensing key details about the models' capabilities, safety evaluations” Source: Anthropic Transparency Hub · fetched 2026-07-25
|
States it publishes what systems can and can't do (system cards referenced informally); not contractually incorporated
“We publish what our systems can and can't do” Source: OpenAI usage policies & system cards · fetched 2026-07-25
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Model cards published and referenced contractually via Responsible Use Guidelines
“the model cards, available at https://docs.cohere.ai/generation-card/” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Training data provenance statements |
States training on publicly available Internet info, licensed third-party datasets, opted-in user data, synthetic data
“proprietary mix of publicly available information from the Internet, public and private datasets” Source: Anthropic model cards / Transparency Hub · fetched 2026-07-25
|
Silent (no training-data source statements in these documents)
“not specified”
|
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Not specified beyond noting X data integration and measures to limit undesirable training data
“We take measures to limit undesirable training data and outputs.” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
Data statement referenced in Responsible Use Guidelines; provider states it does not intentionally collect personal info for training
“the data statement, available at https://docs.cohere.ai/data-statement/” Source: Cohere Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-18
|
| Appeal & redress mechanisms |
Privacy denials may be appealed by email; report bad outputs to usersafety; no detailed suspension-appeal timeline
“You may also have the right to appeal requests that we deny by emailing” Source: Anthropic Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Appeal path for policy enforcement mistakes referenced; no timelines stated
“You can appeal if you think we have made a mistake enforcing policy” archived capture · 2026-07-25 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: OpenAI Usage Policies |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Gemini API Additional Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Appeal of suspension/termination by contacting support@x.ai; no timeline stated
“you can file an appeal with us by contacting support@x.ai” archived capture · 2026-07-15 stale · capture >7 days old
This source blocks automated retrieval, so the observatory relies on Internet Archive captures. The text is evidence of what the document said on that date, not necessarily what it says today. Source: xAI Terms of Service |
No provision (4 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Cohere Terms of Use and 3 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (4)
|
| EU AI Act role allocation |
No provision (7 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Anthropic Commercial Terms of Service and 6 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (7)
|
Not specified as AI Act roles; DPA allocates GDPR roles (OpenAI processor, customer controller)
“OpenAI acts as a Data Processor on the Customer's behalf” Source: OpenAI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-18
|
not specified (DPA allocates GDPR processor/controller roles, not AI Act roles)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed xAI Terms of Service and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
EU AI Act FAQs referenced re GPAI Code of Practice; no explicit provider/deployer role allocation in terms
“EU AI Act FAQs FAQs regarding the GPAI Code of Practice” Source: Cohere Sub-processors (Trust Center) · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Open Model Providers
Providers whose tracked terms govern open-weight model families, split by what the terms are: a hosted-service contract, or the licence attached to the distributed weights.
Hosted platforms 3
checked 2026-08-16 02:22 UTC.xlsx
| Term dimension | DeepSeek platformDeepSeek | Moonshot platformMoonshot AI | Mistral platformMistralalso serves proprietary models |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity & reservation terms |
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed DeepSeek Terms of Use and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Data use & AI training |
Trains by default on de-identified inputs/outputs; opt-out via 'Improve the model for everyone'; ZDR not specified
“you can opt out by turning off "Improve the model for everyone".” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
trains/uses content by default; enterprise opt-out via written agreement; no ZDR stated
“Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, Customer Content may be used for the foregoing…” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Trains by default with opt-out; ~30 rolling days API input/output retention for abuse; ZDR available (disables retention)
“Your Input and Output, subject to your opt-out.” Source: Mistral AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Suspension rights |
May suspend/restrict for Terms violations or risk/harm; DeepSeek judges independently; notice not required
“including but not limited to, issuing warnings... restricting account functions, suspending usage” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
suspension for AUP/law violation, non-payment, payment risk; may be without prior notice
“Without prior notice, we may take measures against you, including ... suspending use” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Termination |
Customer may terminate and delete account; deleted account content not retrievable; provider may retain some data per law
“you will not be able to reactivate your account or retrieve any of the…” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Customer may terminate anytime by deleting account; on cancellation data permanently deleted (no retrieval window)
“your account information, data, APIs, and any remaining balance will be permanently deleted” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Post-termination data access: no longer accessible after 30 days following termination
“no longer be accessible upon the expiry of a thirty (30) days period following…” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Unilateral modification |
Provider may revise terms; effective on posting; continued use = acceptance; notice only if rights greatly affected
“Once announced, it replaces the original terms.” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Provider may update; publishes updated version and effective date (effective on posting)
“we will publish an updated version and effective date on the page” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Provider may amend policies from time to time; effective on posting (Privacy Policy)
“We may amend this Privacy Policy from time to time” Source: Mistral AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Governing law & disputes |
Law: PRC mainland; forum: court at DeepSeek's registered office (Hangzhou); arbitration: no; class waiver: not specified
“governed by the laws of the People's Republic of China in the mainland” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Governing law Singapore; SIAC arbitration in Singapore (binding, yes); class waiver not specified
“finally resolved by arbitration administered by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Law of France; Courts of France (per SCC Module 4 in DPA); arbitration/class waiver not specified
“The governing law in Clause 17 is the law of France;” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Liability caps & carveouts |
Cap: greater of 12-months' fees paid or $100; indirect/consequential waived; carveout for intentional/gross negligence
“WILL NOT EXCEED THE GREATER OF THE AMOUNT YOU PAID... OR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS…” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Cap: 12 months' fees; consequential damages waived; carveouts for gross negligence, indemnity, confidentiality, data-protection
“shall not exceed the total amount paid ... during the twelve (12) months preceding” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
DPA liability subject to exclusions and limitations in the Agreement; specific cap not published here
“subject to the exclusions and limitations of liability set out in the Agreement” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Output IP indemnification |
No output IP indemnity; outputs provided as-is, customer bears responsibility
“THAT ANY OUTPUT... WILL BE ACCURATE, UP-TO-DATE, RELIABLE, NON-INFRINGING OR SECURE” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
no (customer indemnifies provider; no provider output IP indemnity)
“You shall be responsible for and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Moonshot AI” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Model deprecation & version pinning |
No documented pinning; provider may modify/suspend/terminate services with notice if rights greatly affected
“we may add, upgrade, modify, suspend, or terminate services” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Benchmarking & eval restrictions |
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed DeepSeek Terms of Use and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| No-compete-training clauses |
none - training other models expressly permitted
“training other models (such as model distillation), etc.” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
competing-models-only (prohibits developing competitive models without authorization)
“creating applications, products, Services, or models that have potential competitive possibilities” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Capacity delivery remedies |
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed DeepSeek Terms of Use and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Assignment & financing clauses |
Data may be disclosed in corporate transactions incl. financing; assignment rights not otherwise specified
“reorganization, financing, change of control, or acquisition” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Provider may assign to affiliate or in merger/acquisition on notice; no lender step-in language
“Moonshot AI may assign or transfer this Agreement to an affiliate ... upon notice” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Availability definition |
no SLA / uptime not committed
“We make no warranty that the Services are available or will continue” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
“the uninterrupted, error-free, or secure use of the Services” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
no SLA / uptime not committed
|
| Credit regime |
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed DeepSeek Terms of Use and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Claim mechanics |
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed DeepSeek Terms of Use and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| SLA exclusions |
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed DeepSeek Terms of Use and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| International data transfer mechanism |
Refers generally to 'appropriate safeguards' per applicable law; no named mechanism (SCCs/DPF) specified
“we will use appropriate safeguards for transferring Personal Data outside” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
no named mechanism; references appropriate safeguards for cross-border transfers
“we will implement appropriate safeguards, consistent with applicable data protection laws” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform privacy policy · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Relies on SCCs (Module 4 Processor-to-Controller) and adequacy decisions; Article 46 safeguards referenced
“pursuant to the SCCs” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Data residency commitments |
Data collected, processed and stored in People's Republic of China
“we directly collect, process and store your Personal Data in People's Republic of China” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Data stored on servers in Singapore; reserves cross-border transfer
“We store the information we collect in secure servers located in Singapore.” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform privacy policy · fetched 2026-08-04
|
No firm regional commitment; reserves right to transfer to adequate countries or via SCCs; EU providers prioritized
“Customer authorizes Mistral AI to transfer Personal Data to any country deemed to have…” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Sub-processor transparency |
Describes categories (service providers, corporate group) but no published list, notice window, or objection right
“We engage service providers that help us provide, support, and develop the Services” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Service providers described by category; no published list, notice window, or objection right
“These providers include hosting services, customer service vendors, cloud services” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform privacy policy · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Published list on Trust Center; email notice on additions; objection right within 10 days on data-protection grounds
“object in writing to Mistral AI's appointment of a new Subprocessor within ten (10)…” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Government access commitments |
May share data on good-faith belief for legal process; no notification or challenge commitment; no transparency report
“comply with applicable law, legal process or government requests” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
May share with authorities on good-faith belief; no notification, challenge, or transparency-report commitment
“comply with applicable law, legal process or government requests” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform privacy policy · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Will inform customer of legal requirement to disclose unless prohibited; transfers rights requests to customer; no transparency report mentioned
“Mistral AI shall promptly inform Customer of such legal requirement, unless prohibited” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Retention & human review of content |
Uses safety monitoring providers and technical review of user behavior; inputs retained as long as account exists
“support and safety monitoring services providers to assist us in ensuring the safety” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Content used to improve services; employee access limited; inputs retained while account active
“account, input, and payment information are retained while your account is active” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform privacy policy · fetched 2026-08-04
|
Automated moderation/abuse monitoring on APIs; feedback used to train; retention ~30 rolling days for API abuse unless ZDR
“Automated moderation, including abuse monitoring on our APIs” Source: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Prohibited high-risk uses |
AUP prohibits illegal/dangerous uses, violence/terrorism, minor exploitation; no explicit facial-recognition/predictive-policing/weapons list
“dangerous purposes that may have serious harmful impacts on physical health” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Prohibits real-time public biometric ID for law enforcement, non-consensual facial recognition databases, social scoring, predictive criminal-risk profiling
“Create or expand facial recognition databases without consent.” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Model documentation commitments |
Published 'Model Mechanism and Training Methods' explanation, referenced in terms
“We have published the "Model Principles and Training Methods Explanation"” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
| Training data provenance statements |
States publicly available data obtained online used to train models
“We may obtain publicly available Personal Data via online sources to train our models” Source: DeepSeek Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
States publicly available internet information used to develop models
“obtain publicly available information via Internet sources in order to develop the models” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform privacy policy · fetched 2026-08-04
|
States training on publicly available internet data, third-party datasets/databases, product usage, curated and synthetic data since 2023
“trained on data that is publicly available on the Internet by third parties” Source: Mistral AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| Appeal & redress mechanisms |
Explanation/objection opportunity for account restrictions; privacy request appeal via email; account recovery appeal process
“we will offer an opportunity for you to explain or object” Source: DeepSeek Terms of Use · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Appeal/complaint via contact email; no timelines stated
“For feedback, appeal or complaint(especially copyright complaint) ,please contact us” Source: Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement · fetched 2026-08-04
|
US users may appeal rights-request decisions by email 'US Rights Response Appeal'; right to appeal automated decisions stated
“You may appeal our response to your request by emailing us” Source: Mistral AI Privacy Policy · fetched 2026-07-27
|
| EU AI Act role allocation |
No provision (2 documents reviewed)
Reviewed DeepSeek Terms of Use and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No provision (3 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Moonshot (Kimi) Platform model-use agreement and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
No provision (5 documents reviewed)
Reviewed Mistral AI Terms of Service and 4 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (5)
|
Weights & licenses 9
checked 2026-08-16 02:22 UTC.xlsx
| Term dimension | gpt-ossOpenAI | GemmaGoogle | LlamaMeta | DeepSeek open modelsDeepSeek | QwenAlibaba | Kimi open modelsMoonshot AI | GLMZ.ai | MiniMaxMiniMax | Mistral open modelsMistral |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data use & AI training |
Apache-2.0: contains no provision about data or its use for training
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No governing document captured
No governing document for this entry is currently captured; the previously registered source was withdrawn because it does not govern what this entry tracks. Source: Host privacy policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
not specified - weights license; no provider data-use terms
|
MIT: contains no provision about data or its use for training
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no provision about data or its use for training
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no provision about data or its use for training
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no provision about data or its use for training
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not specified (open-weights model card; no service data-use terms)
|
| Suspension rights |
Apache-2.0: contains no suspension provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Google may remotely restrict usage it believes violates the agreement
“Google reserves the right to restrict (remotely or otherwise) usage” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
not specified; license termination for breach only, no service suspension
“Meta may terminate this Agreement if you are in breach” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: contains no suspension provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no suspension provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no suspension provision
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no suspension provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no suspension provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Termination |
Patent license terminates if you institute patent litigation
“any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate” Source: gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Google may terminate for breach; on termination user must delete all copies. No data-retrieval window (weights license).
“Google may terminate this Agreement if you are in breach” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Meta may terminate on breach; on termination licensee must delete Materials; no data-retrieval window
“Upon termination of this Agreement, you shall delete and cease use” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: contains no termination provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
License terminates on instituting patent litigation over the Work
“any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate” Source: Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) · fetched 2026-07-19
|
Modified MIT: contains no termination provision
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no termination provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: grants a "perpetual ... irrevocable" copyright licence in section 2, and contains one termination provision: the patent licence in section 3 ends if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Unilateral modification |
Apache-2.0: contains no mechanism for changing its own terms
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Google may update the Prohibited Use Policy from time to time; no notice period stated
“Google reserves the right to update this Gemma Prohibited Use Policy from time to…” Source: Model card / usage policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
AUP states most recent copy is posted online (effective on posting); no notice commitment
“The most recent copy of this policy can be found at” Source: Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: contains no mechanism for changing its own terms
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no mechanism for changing its own terms
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no mechanism for changing its own terms
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no mechanism for changing its own terms
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no mechanism for changing its own terms
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Governing law & disputes |
Apache-2.0: names no governing law or forum
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Governing law California; exclusive jurisdiction Santa Clara County courts; no arbitration or class waiver stated
“governed by the laws of the State of California” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
California law; exclusive jurisdiction in California courts; no arbitration; no class waiver mentioned
“governed and construed under the laws of the State of California” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: names no governing law or forum
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: names no governing law or forum
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: names no governing law or forum
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: names no governing law or forum
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: names no governing law or forum
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Liability caps & carveouts |
No liability for direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential damages
“shall any Contributor be liable to You for damages” Source: gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No liability for any direct, indirect, special, consequential, or punitive damages; no cap figure (full exclusion). No stated carveouts.
“SHALL GOOGLE OR ITS AFFILIATES BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No liability for lost profits or indirect/consequential/incidental/punitive damages; no fee-based cap stated
“IN NO EVENT WILL META ... BE LIABLE ... FOR ANY LOST PROFITS OR…” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
No liability; provided 'AS IS'. Authors not liable for any claim/damages; no cap or carveouts specified
“IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE” Source: DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No liability for direct/indirect/consequential damages; consequential waived
“shall any Contributor be liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,…” Source: Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) · fetched 2026-07-19
|
License disclaims all liability; no cap structure. 'IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS...BE LIABLE'; consequential not separately addressed
“IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE” Source: Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
MIT 'as is', no liability; authors not liable for any claim or damages
“IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE” Source: GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
No liability; provided 'as is', no warranty, authors not liable for any claim or damages
“IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM” Source: MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
as per Apache 2.0 (warranty and liability disclaimed by reference)
“licensed under the [Apache 2.0 License]” Source: Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) · fetched 2026-07-20
|
| Output IP indemnification |
Apache-2.0: contains no indemnity running to the licensee; section 9 addresses indemnity only as an obligation a redistributor takes on toward contributors
“WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND” Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: language touches this area but sets no clear term. Documents reviewed (2)
Source: gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
no (Google claims no rights in outputs; user solely responsible)
“You and your users are solely responsible for Outputs” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
no; licensee indemnifies Meta, not vice versa
“You will indemnify and hold harmless Meta from and against any claim” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: contains no indemnity running to the licensee
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no indemnity running to the licensee; section 9 addresses indemnity only as an obligation a redistributor takes on toward contributors
“WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND” Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: language touches this area but sets no clear term. Documents reviewed (2)
Source: Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) · fetched 2026-07-19
|
no; software provided as-is with no indemnity
“THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND” Source: Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
MIT: contains no indemnity running to the licensee
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
no (Apache 2.0 open-weights license, no indemnity)
“licensed under the [Apache 2.0 License]” Source: Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) · fetched 2026-07-20
|
| Model deprecation & version pinning |
Apache-2.0: makes no continuity or versioning commitment; section 9 permits a redistributor to charge for support but commits no one to provide it
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not specified (only 'Google may update Gemma from time to time'; no notice or pinning terms)
“Google may update Gemma from time to time.” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Llama 4 Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: makes no continuity, support or versioning commitment
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: makes no continuity or versioning commitment; section 9 permits a redistributor to charge for support but commits no one to provide it
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: makes no continuity, support or versioning commitment
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: makes no continuity, support or versioning commitment
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not applicable (self-hosted weights, no retirement); none stated
|
| Benchmarking & eval restrictions |
Apache-2.0: contains no restriction on evaluation or publication
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Gemma Terms of Use: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
Llama 4 Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
unrestricted (MIT imposes no use restrictions)
“to deal
in the Software without restriction” Source: DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
silent (guidance on benchmarking provided, no restriction)
“We recommend using prompts to standardize model outputs when benchmarking” Source: Model card / usage policy · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Modified MIT: contains no restriction on evaluation or publication
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
silent (model card publishes own benchmarks, no restriction stated)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
silent (benchmarks published, no restriction stated)
“We compare Mistral Large 3 to similar sized models.” Source: Mistral-Large-3 model card · fetched 2026-07-20
|
| No-compete-training clauses |
Apache-2.0: contains no field-of-use restriction
“perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license” Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: language touches this area but sets no clear term. Documents reviewed (2)
Source: gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
none (outputs not deemed Model Derivatives; no restriction on training other models with outputs)
“For clarity, Outputs are not deemed Model Derivatives.” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
any-model-training permitted with naming/attribution; no prohibition on training other models
“use the Llama Materials or any outputs ... to create, train, fine tune, or…” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
none (MIT permits unrestricted use, no training restriction)
“to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense” Source: DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
none (Apache-2.0, no output-use restriction)
“no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of” Source: Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) · fetched 2026-07-19
|
Modified MIT: contains no field-of-use restriction
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
none (MIT permits use without restriction)
“to deal in the Software without restriction” Source: GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no field-of-use restriction
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Model license |
Apache License, Version 2.0
“Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004” Source: gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Gemma Terms of Use (bespoke Gemma community license)
“Gemma is provided under and subject to the Gemma Terms of Use” Source: Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Llama 4 Community License Agreement (bespoke community license)
“LLAMA 4 COMMUNITY LICENSE AGREEMENT” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
|
Apache License 2.0
“Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004” Source: Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) · fetched 2026-07-19
|
Modified MIT License
“Modified MIT License” Source: Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
|
MiniMax Community License (bespoke non-commercial + commercial-authorization license)
“MINIMAX COMMUNITY LICENSE” Source: MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Apache 2.0
“This model is licensed under the [Apache 2.0 License]” Source: Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) · fetched 2026-07-20
|
| Assignment & financing clauses |
Apache-2.0: contains no assignment or change-of-control provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Gemma Terms of Use: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Gemma Terms of Use (Gemma license) and 2 other governing documents: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (3)
|
license is non-transferable; no financing/step-in language
“non-exclusive, worldwide, non-transferable and royalty-free limited license” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: contains no assignment or change-of-control provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no assignment or change-of-control provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no assignment or change-of-control provision
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no assignment or change-of-control provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no assignment or change-of-control provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| International data transfer mechanism |
Apache-2.0: contains no international data transfer provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No governing document captured
No governing document for this entry is currently captured; the previously registered source was withdrawn because it does not govern what this entry tracks. Source: Host privacy policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Llama 4 Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no international data transfer provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no international data transfer provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no international data transfer provision
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no international data transfer provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no international data transfer provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Data residency commitments |
Apache-2.0: contains no data residency provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No governing document captured
No governing document for this entry is currently captured; the previously registered source was withdrawn because it does not govern what this entry tracks. Source: Host privacy policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Llama 4 Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no data residency provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no data residency provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no data residency provision
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no data residency provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not specified (self-hosted, no service commitment)
|
| Sub-processor transparency |
Apache-2.0: contains no sub-processor provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No governing document captured
No governing document for this entry is currently captured; the previously registered source was withdrawn because it does not govern what this entry tracks. Source: Host privacy policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Llama 4 Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no sub-processor provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no sub-processor provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no sub-processor provision
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no sub-processor provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no sub-processor provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Government access commitments |
Apache-2.0: contains no provision on government or law enforcement access
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No governing document captured
No governing document for this entry is currently captured; the previously registered source was withdrawn because it does not govern what this entry tracks. Source: Host privacy policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Llama 4 Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no provision on government or law enforcement access
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no provision on government or law enforcement access
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no provision on government or law enforcement access
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no provision on government or law enforcement access
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no provision on government or law enforcement access
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| Retention & human review of content |
Apache-2.0: contains no retention or human-review provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No governing document captured
No governing document for this entry is currently captured; the previously registered source was withdrawn because it does not govern what this entry tracks. Source: Host privacy policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
not specified; provides reporting channels for risky content but no human-review/retention terms
|
MIT: contains no retention or human-review provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no retention or human-review provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not specified; self-hosted weights, no provider processing described
|
MIT: contains no retention or human-review provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not specified (self-hosted model, no provider content review)
|
| Prohibited high-risk uses |
Apache-2.0: contains no acceptable-use or prohibited-use provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Prohibits non-consensual tracking/monitoring, generating PII for harm, and unfair impacts on protected characteristics; no explicit weapons/facial-recognition terms named
“Tracking or monitoring people without their consent” Source: Model card / usage policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
Prohibits weapons/weapon development, military/nuclear/ITAR/chemical-biological, critical infrastructure, unauthorized collection of sensitive/biometric data
“Guns and illegal weapons (including weapon development)” Source: Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-19
|
not specified (MIT imposes no use restrictions)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no acceptable-use or prohibited-use provision
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
none; license permits use without restriction except attribution at scale
“to deal in the Software without restriction” Source: Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
MIT: contains no acceptable-use or prohibited-use provision
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Prohibits military purpose, harm to minors, harmful disinformation, and discrimination/hate speech; facial recognition/predictive policing not named
“Assist with, engage in or otherwise support any military purpose” Source: MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) · fetched 2026-07-18
|
only third-party rights restriction stated; no high-risk use list
“You must not use this model in a manner that infringes” Source: Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) · fetched 2026-07-20
|
| Model documentation commitments |
Model card published for gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b
“gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card” Source: Model card / usage policy · fetched 2026-08-11
|
not specified (license references models in Appendix; no contractual reference to model/system cards)
|
License references accompanying Documentation but no system/model card contractual commitment
““Documentation” means the specifications, manuals and documentation accompanying Llama 4” Source: Llama 4 Community License · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: is a licence file and contains no documentation commitment
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Model card published with overview, features, usage; not contractually referenced
“Qwen3-235B-A22B has the following features:” Source: Model card / usage policy · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Model card published with architecture, variants and evaluation results; not contractually referenced
“Kimi K2 is a state-of-the-art mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model” Source: Kimi K2 model card · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Model card published on Hugging Face with benchmarks and deployment info; not contractually referenced
“# GLM-5.2” Source: GLM-5.2 model card · fetched 2026-07-20
|
Model card published on Hugging Face describing architecture and usage; not referenced contractually
“MiniMax-M3 is a native multimodal model with 1M context” Source: MiniMax-M3 model card · fetched 2026-07-23
|
model card published with features, benchmarks, limitations
“### Known Issues / Limitations” Source: Mistral-Large-3 model card · fetched 2026-07-20
|
| Training data provenance statements |
Apache-2.0: is a licence file and contains no provenance statement
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
No governing document captured
No governing document for this entry is currently captured; the previously registered source was withdrawn because it does not govern what this entry tracks. Source: Host privacy policy · fetched 2026-07-18
|
silent - no statement of training data sources
|
MIT: is a licence file and contains no provenance statement
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
not specified (mentions pretraining/post-training, no sources)
“Training Stage: Pretraining & Post-training” Source: Model card / usage policy · fetched 2026-07-20
|
States training token volume only; no source description. 'Pre-trained a 1T parameter MoE model on 15.5T tokens'
“Pre-trained a 1T parameter MoE model on 15.5T tokens” Source: Kimi K2 model card · fetched 2026-07-20
|
MIT: is a licence file and contains no provenance statement
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Silent on data sources; only notes mixed-modality training across text, image, video
“M3 undergoes mixed-modality training from the very first step” Source: MiniMax-M3 model card · fetched 2026-07-23
|
not specified (trained from the ground up; sources not stated)
“trained from the ground up” Source: Mistral-Large-3 model card · fetched 2026-07-20
|
| Appeal & redress mechanisms |
Apache-2.0: contains no appeal or redress mechanism
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not specified (no stated appeal path for restriction/termination in Gemma terms)
|
not specified; only violation-reporting channels provided
“Please report any violation of this Policy” Source: Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: contains no appeal or redress mechanism
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: contains no appeal or redress mechanism
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: contains no appeal or redress mechanism
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: contains no appeal or redress mechanism
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: contains no appeal or redress mechanism
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
| EU AI Act role allocation |
Apache-2.0: allocates no provider or deployer roles
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed gpt-oss model license (Apache 2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
not specified (no provider/deployer role allocation)
|
not specified; EU multimodal-model rights restriction stated but no provider/deployer role allocation
“rights granted under Section 1(a) ... are not being granted to you if you…” Source: Llama 4 Acceptable Use Policy · fetched 2026-07-19
|
MIT: allocates no provider or deployer roles
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed DeepSeek-R1 model license (MIT): no provision addresses this term.
|
Apache-2.0: allocates no provider or deployer roles
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Qwen3-235B-A22B model license (Apache-2.0) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Modified MIT: allocates no provider or deployer roles
A modified MIT licence grants MIT's permissions subject to conditions the publisher has added, and otherwise contains only notice retention and a warranty disclaimer. The added conditions appear in the licence text itself. Reviewed Kimi K2 model license (Modified MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MIT: allocates no provider or deployer roles
The MIT licence grants permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the software, requires the copyright notice to be retained, and disclaims warranty and liability. It contains no other provisions. Reviewed GLM-5.2 model license (MIT) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
MiniMax Community License: the terms appear silent on this point
A bespoke community licence, drafted by the publisher rather than adopted from a standard form. It sets its own scope, so what it leaves out sits alongside what it chose to include. Reviewed MiniMax-M3 model license (MiniMax Community License) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Apache-2.0: allocates no provider or deployer roles
Apache-2.0 grants expressly perpetual and irrevocable copyright and patent licences, requires notice retention and change attribution, withholds trademark rights, terminates the patent licence if the licensee brings patent litigation over the work, and disclaims warranty and liability. Reviewed Mistral-Large-3 licence (Apache-2.0, declared in model card) and 1 other governing document: no provision addresses this term. Documents reviewed (2)
|
Pick 2-3 providers
Choose two or three providers to compare.
Generated 2026-08-16 02:30 UTC